Illinois asked SCOTUS not to hear Trump's request to deploy the National Guard to Chicago amid a disagreement about plans for immigration enforcement in the state's most populous city.
Illinois asked SCOTUS not to hear Trump's request to deploy the National Guard to Chicago amid a disagreement about plans for immigration enforcement in the state's most populous city.
The state of Illinois asked the U.S. Supreme Court not to hear President Donald Trump's request to deploy the National Guard to Chicago amid a disagreement about plans for immigration enforcement in the state's most populous city.
Top attorneys for Illinois and Chicago said Trump has overstepped his authority. They were joined by officials from Los Angeles, California, and elsewhere in the legal fight over who controls the troops.
"The Court should decline applicants' request to unsettle the equitable judgment reflected in the Seventh Circuit's order and to take the dramatic step of permitting deployment of National Guard troops over Illinois's objection for the handful of days the [temporary restraining order] currently remains in effect," Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul's legal team wrote in a legal filing.
The state and others have challenged Trump's authority to deploy the National Guard to cities over objection of local leaders. Illinois officials said federal authorities aren't needed.
"Applicants' contrary arguments rest on mischaracterizations of the factual record or the lower courts' views of the legal principles," the state said in its response. "As the district court found, state and local law enforcement officers have handled isolated protest activities in Illinois, and there is no credible evidence to the contrary."
America First Policy Institute, a nonprofit group, said Trump should control the orders.
"Plaintiffs have asserted nine claims, each of which is a variation on the same underlying request for the federal courts to second-guess the President's determination that the conditions for federalizing the National Guard have been satisfied here," attorneys for the group wrote. "There is no express private cause of action to bring these claims, and for nearly 200 years this Court has recognized that the President's determination is nonjusticiable."
Filings in the Illinois case came the same day that a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit overturned a temporary restraining order issued by a federal judge in Portland, Ore., removing a judicial obstruction that prevented Trump from sending Oregon National Guard troops to Portland.
The ruling comes in the wake of Trump deploying National Guard troops to U.S. cities including Los Angeles, Washington D.C., Portland, Memphis and Chicago to protect the work of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Agents have been attacked, hampered by agitators and protested against in U.S. cities.
The legal battle is expected to continue on multiple fronts.
While hundreds of National Guard troops are already in Illinois, U.S. District Judge April Perry stopped their deployment. She said she found federal officials' assertions about coordinated violence by protesters "unreliable."
#####
We invite you to join us for a special live presentation/celebration—honoring 250 years of Marine Corps legacy, tradition, & service to our great nation this Saturday—from 12-8PM ET. Hosted by, Steve Bannon.
JOIN LIVE:
🚨BREAKING: A shooting incident has unfolded at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Grand Blanc, Michigan. Reports indicate multiple victims, with estimates suggesting 6-8 people injured. Authorities confirm the shooter has been taken down.
The church building is fully engulfed in flames, with the roof having collapsed and reports of ammunition detonating amid the fire.
Our thoughts and prayers go out to the victims, their families, and the community.
FBI agents early Friday raided the home of former National Security Advisor John Bolton as part of an investigation into a national security matter, U.S. officials told Just the News.
FBI Director Kash Patel hinted at the action in a cryptic post on his X social media account.
“NO ONE is above the law… FBI agents on mission,” Patel wrote.
Officials said the search of Bolton’s home involved a national security case that began under the Biden administration, but wasn’t aggressively pursued until Patel took over earlier this year. They declined to be more specific.
Bolton was one of several national security advisers for Trump, but was eventually fired and became a critic of the current president and Patel's nomination as FBI Director.
Earlier this year, Trump pulled Bolton's security clearance and Secret Service protection, drawing objections from some GOP senators like Tom Cotton of Arkansas.
After that action, Bolton eerily predicted he might face further action from Patel's FBI.
"I think the central characteristic Trump seems to be looking for in all of the appointees we’ve seen so far is fealty to him," he told the Christian Science Monitor in January. "A lot of people say it’s loyalty. Loyalty is a virtue, it’s a good thing. That’s not what Trump wants. He wants fealty to him. He wants submissiveness. He wants yes-men and yes-women. And Kash Patel has demonstrated, in his service in Trump’s first term, that he’ll simply do whatever Trump wants.
In response to a question in the interview about Patel, he said: "I don’t think he’s qualified," Bolton told the Christian Science Monitor "And if there is a retribution campaign, and there certainly seems to be, he would be a central element of it. I think that’s dangerous."